Why is patented infrastructure a problem?

Patented infrastructure is a problem because it can limit access, stifle competition, increase costs, reduce interoperability, and create dependence on a single entity, ultimately hindering innovation and progress.

  1. Limited access: When infrastructure is patented, it can limit access to the technology and prevent others from using it, even if they have a legitimate need to do so.
  2. High costs: Patent holders can charge high licensing fees to use their patented technology, which can make it difficult for others to access the infrastructure.
  3. Innovation stifling: Patented infrastructure can stifle innovation by preventing others from building upon or improving the existing technology.
  4. Dependence on a single entity: When infrastructure is patented, it can create a dependence on a single entity, which can be a risk if the entity experiences financial difficulties or changes its business model.
  5. Limited interoperability: Patented infrastructure can limit interoperability with other technologies and systems, making it difficult to integrate with other solutions.
  6. Barriers to entry: Patented infrastructure can create barriers to entry for new companies or individuals who want to enter the market, as they may not be able to access the patented technology.
  7. Inequitable distribution of benefits: Patented infrastructure can lead to an inequitable distribution of benefits, as the patent holder may reap most of the benefits while others may not be able to access the technology.

In the context of infrastructure, patents can be particularly problematic because they can limit access to essential technologies and create barriers to entry for new companies or individuals. This can lead to a lack of competition, innovation, and progress in the field.

In contrast, open standards and technologies can promote innovation, competition, and progress by allowing multiple companies and individuals to access and build upon the technology.